|
30 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
IndianTrust.com is the web portal containing valuable information on the Indian Trust Settlement of the lawsuit entitled Cobell v. Salazar.
The Settlement was first approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on December 21, 2010 and legislation for its approval was signed by Pres. Obama on Dec. 8, 2010. Pres. Obama authorized the funding of $3.4 billion into the Settlement.
The Indian Trust Settlement pertains to the class action lawsuit involving individual Indian lands, funds, assets and other properties entrusted to the management of the federal government. The lawsuit claims that the federal government has committed violations concerning its trust duties by mismanaging the funds, assets, and individual Indian lands. The Settlement involves all account holders of Individual Indian Money (IIM), heirs and beneficiaries of deceased individual land owners or IIM account holders, and Individual Indians whose ownership interest of land is in restricted status or is held in trust.
If you are a Class Member and wish to participate in the Settlement, you must register and file a Claim Form. You can either submit the Claim Form online or through mail. Downloadable and printable Claim Forms can be obtained from www.IndianTrust.com. You may also request the Indian Trust Settlement Administrator to mail a Claim Form to you by telephoning toll-free number 1-800-961-6109 or writing to Indian Trust Settlement P.O. Box 9577, Dublin OH 43017-4877. You may also reach them by sending an email at Info@IndianTrust.com. Claim Forms must be filed or submitted within 45 days of the Settlement
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
29 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
IdahoFiberSettlement.com is the official website containing detailed and vital pieces of information on the Idaho Fiber Settlement Lawsuit for the Class Action lawsuit entitled Koyle, et al. v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. No. 01-0286-S-BLW.
The lawsuit pertains to the installation of underground fiber-optic cables and other telecommunications equipment within the railroad rights of way in all areas of the United States. The installation was done with the consent and permission of the railroads but without the knowledge of the adjoining land owners. The lawsuit stressed that before the installation of any telecommunications equipment and facilities, the Defendants should also have asked the permission and consent of the adjoining land owners on the railroad rights of way. The Defendants deny doing anything wrong, saying that permission from the railroads are enough to make them pursue all installation plans of the facilities and equipment.
The Settlement was agreed by both parties to avoid risks and further cost of trial. Class Members of the Settlement will receive payment from the Defendants and will be given an easement in the controversial railroad rights of way. To know whether you are part of the Settlement and if you are eligible for claims, visit the FAQ section of www.IdahoFiberSettlement.com. You may also call 1-877-625-9417 or write to Fiber-Optic Cable Litigation, P.O. Box 81, Minneapolis, MN 55440-0081.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
28 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
HIDSettlement.com/Claim is a webpage where you can find a downloadable Claim Form for the HID Settlement.
The Class Action lawsuit entitled Collado, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. concerns the high intensity discharge (HID) headlights created by Toyota Motors for its 2006-2009 Toyota Prius vehicles. According to the claims of the lawsuit, the HID headlights of the Toyota Prius often experiences technical problems , such as automatic shut off, while the vehicle is being driven. Toyota is denying all complaints but agreed to resolve the case through a Settlement. The Settlement agreement states that Toyota will reimburse expenses spent on previous HID headlight and electronic control unit repairs and will extend its New Vehicle Limited Warranty on repairs for 5 years or until the vehicle reaches 50,000 miles from the date of purchase or lease. Individuals who leased or own or used to own a 2006-2009 Toyota Prius created or attached with HID headlights are eligible to receive the benefits stated under the Settlement agreement.
To receive cash benefits, you have to fill up and submit the claim form found at the HIDSettlement.com/claim webpage. Deadline for submission of the claim form has expired, as it had to be postmarked May 30, 2011. You can still avail of the extended warranty even without the claim form. Deadlines for requests to opt out or for exclusion from the Settlement have also expired. A Fairness Hearing is slated to be held on Aug. 1, 2011.
To view the HID Settlement claim form, visit www.HIDSettlement.com/claim. Call 1-800-746-3614 for more information regarding the Settlement.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
27 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
FormulaSettlement.com/ClaimForm.aspx is a page where you can particularly find, fill up and submit a Claim Form online to avail of the benefits set forth in the proposed Formula Settlement. A downloadable and printable copy of the Claim Form may also be obtained from the site for those who opt to send the Claim Form by mail instead of online. All Claim Forms must be postmarked Nov. 25, 2011. If you choose to send the Claim Form by mail, you can send it to Infant Formula Settlement, P.O. Box 2472, Faribault, MN 55021-9172.
The Claim Form found at the said webpage is to be filled up and submitted by individuals who are party to the In Re: Enfamil LIPIL Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Settlement. The Settlement pertains to the lawsuit raised against Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. According to the complaints raised by the Plaintiffs or Class Representatives of the lawsuit, Mead Johnson falsely implied in its advertisements that Enfamil LIPIL is the only formula for infants that contain the important nutrients DHA and ARA. The lawsuit alleges that Mead Johnson
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
26 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
DODClassSettlement.com is the website to go to if you are looking for a DOD Class Settlement Claim Form. The website contains vital information about the Class Action Lawsuit entitled DOD Technologies, Inc. v. Mesirow Insurance Services, Inc. et al.
Information found on the DODClassSettlement.com website is exclusive for Settlement Class Members only. If you are in search for information regarding the full description of the lawsuit and the full details about the Settlement, you need to be a verified Settlement Class Member. Representatives or authorized persons working for a Settlement Class Member may also be able to access the website.
Any Class Member can have access to the admin portal of the website by logging in using a Claim Number and a PIN number. These numbers can be found on the top portion of the Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement received by every qualified Class Member through mail. If you are a Class Member but have not received a copy of the Notice, you may have to contact the Settlement Administrator to make a claim and to be granted access to the admin portal of the DOD Class Settlement. If you have received the Notice but have lost your PIN, could not find your PIN number on your copy, or have trouble logging in, the best thing you can do is contact the Settlement Administrator at 1-877-271-6008.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
25 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
DickSmithFordSettlement.com contains full details about the Dick Smith Ford, Inc. Settlement. The case bears the title Moody v. Dick Smith, Ford, Inc., Case No. 0916-CV25132. People who purchased or leased any vehicle from Moody Smith Ford, Inc. within the dates August 13, 2004 until August 27, 2009 and who were made to pay a fee, such as a Processing Fee, Customer Service Fee, Doc Fee, Customer Benefit Fee, or any other similar fees may benefit a great deal from the information contained in this website.
The Class Action Lawsuit was entered into by Class Representative Ryne Moody on the basis that Dick Smith Ford violated Missouri laws, particularly the Missouri Merchandise Practices Act and the Missouri Practicing Law Statute by charging unauthorized fees to customers who purchased or leased any type of vehicle from them on the dates stated above. Moody and the rest of the Class Members who filed the case stated that the fees were a violation of the Missouri law because only lawyers are allowed to charge such fees for legal purposes. The Plaintiffs demanded that a refund of the fees be made to the Class Members.
All claims stated in the lawsuit were strongly denied by Dick Smith Ford, Inc. and a legislation that took effect in August 2009 backed its claim that the fees were indeed legal and not a violation of the Missouri law. Dick Smith Ford still agreed to settle, however, to end any substantial risks that may arise from continued litigation. Agreement to the Settlement is not to be deemed admission of violation by Dick Smith Ford. Information about the benefits gained from the Settlement is fully explained at www.DisckSmithFordSettlement.com.
Options to submit a claim, object, or exclude from the Settlement is no longer valid as of this time. All deadlines have already passed for claim submission, objection, and exclusion requests. If you have some questions that need answers regarding the Settlement, visit the FAQ section of the DickSmithFordSettlement.com website or contact the Settlement Administrator at 1-888-475-6829.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
24 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
DebitCardSettlement.com is the website you may want to go to if you are looking for detailed and comprehensive information regarding the Settlement for the Class Action lawsuit entitled Wike v. Vertrue, Inc.
The lawsuit alleges that Vertrue, Inc. and Adaptive Marketing unlawfully charged consumers membership fees in their debit cards when they enrolled in membership programs run by Vertrue, Inc. and Adaptive Marketing. The lawsuit states that the membership fees were charged without prior consent of the consumers and that no copy of the approval was ever given to consumers. This act of the Defendants, according to the lawsuit, is a clear violation of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act or EFTA. All accusations were denied and contested by Vertrue and Adaptive Marketing.
A proposed Settlement was agreed by both parties to end further inconvenience that may be caused by continued trial and litigation. Vertrue and Adaptive Marketing have agreed to pay Class Members $150 each for each membership program that may have been charged to their debit cards. To receive payment, Class Members are required to properly fill up and submit a Claim Form that should be postmarked not later than Dec. 31, 2011. For a complete list of the membership programs that are under the conditions of the Settlement, visit the DebitCardSettlement.com website. To comment or to object to the Settlement, refer to the Legal Notice and FAQ section of the said website.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
23 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
ATTClassActionAdmin.com is the official web portal containing vital information regarding the Buccellato v. AT&T class action settlement. If you are a Class Member and want to keep track of updates to the case, this website is valuable to you.
The lawsuit refers to the alleged failure of AT&T to properly pay its workers overtime pay and to its alleged violation of the federal and state law. The lawsuit appeals at the Court to obligate AT&T to pay Class Members penalties, interest, overtime backpay, and other necessary payments. AT&T stresses that it had done nothing wrong and that all claims are false.
The lawsuit concerns and includes as Class Members the people who worked for the
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
22 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
ATIWindowSettlement.com is where you can find full and detailed information about the settlement on the lawsuit Melnick, et al. v. Aluminum Technology, Inc. It is also in this website where you can find a printable Claim Form that you can use to file a claim.
The lawsuit involves the windows purchased from ATI. According to the suing party, windows and sliding doors purchased from ATI are defective, causing them to leak and to show signs of blistering, cracking, peeling, flaking and deterioration. The lawsuit also states that the defects on the windows forfeited any warranties implied on the window products. ATI strongly denies all statements made by the Plaintiffs.
The Settlement on the lawsuit includes all California residents who used ATI Windows on their properties from 1995 up to the present. Homeowners who have already claimed benefits from prior lawsuits are excluded and are not considered as Class Members. Likewise, those who opted out or requested to be excluded are no longer considered as Class Members.
Class Members who opted to stay in the Settlement must have had their Claim Forms postmarked on May 5, 2011. Those who wanted to opt out and those who wanted to make objections were given until March 7, 2011 to submit their requests. If you want to know more about the terms included in the Settlement, you may refer to the Class Notice provided at the ATIWindowSettlement.com website. You may also contact the Settlement Administrator at 1-888-749-8176.
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
|
22 Jun
|
Posted by admin
|
We wanted to let you know that a ton of new men’s and women’s sunglasses were just added to OakleyVault.com (just in time for summer!) with discounts up to 50% off:
Get up to 50% Off – Oakley Vault Sunglasses, Watches, Cases
Save up to 50% on Authentic Oakley Gear at OakleyVault.com
Free Shipping on orders over $100 at OakleyVault.com
View all current coupon codes from Oakley Vault
| Category: Uncategorized | Tag: |
